Epistemologi Pemikiran Jane Dammen McAuliffe Tentang Hubungan Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32495/nun.v8i1.340Keywords:
Jane Dammen McAuliffe, Al-Qur'an, Tafsir, EpistemologiAbstract
The Qur'anic verse is indeed a text, which to understand it needs to be bridged by scholars who are qualified in the field of linguistic rules to produce an interpretation. Mufasirs and Muslims in general place interpretation as a reference for understanding the Qur'an, but for Jane Dammen McAuliffe, interpretation controls the meaning of the Qur'an. McAuliffe believes that the two cannot be equated and aligned as a way to understand the Qur'an. Thus, one cannot be generalized to represent the general view. The purpose of this article is to attempt to illustrate how McAuliffe views the relationship between the Qur'ān and tafsir as one of the Islamic thinkers. To further examine McAuliffe's thoughts, the method the author uses is library research with a content analysis approach. The results of this article are: First, McAuliffe explains that the interpretation of the Qur'an has been controlling the meaning of the Qur'an. Second, the Qur'an is morphologically unchanging, it lives semantically. Meanwhile, tafsir is considered as a particular hermeneutical configuration. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the Qur'anic verse is indeed a text, which requires linguistic rules to understand. However, the text is also an integrated part of the context, stripping the context that should be attached to the text has the potential to cause gaps in meaning.
References
Agustono, Ihwan, ‘Potret Perkembangan Metodologi Kelompok Orientalis Dalam Studi Al-Qur’an’, Studia Quranika, 4.2 (2020), 159 <https://doi.org/10.21111/studiquran.v4i2.3819>
AM Ismatullah, ‘Konsepsi Ibnu Jarir Al-Thabari Tentang Al-Qur’an, Tafsir Dan Ta’wil’, Fenomena, 4.2 (2012)
Andrew Rippin, Approaches to the History of the Interpretation of the Qur’an (Clarendon Press, 1988)
Bauer, Karen, ‘Introduction’, in Aims, Methods and Contexts of Qurʼanic Exegesis (2nd/8th-9th/15th Centuries), ed. by Karen Bauer, Qurʼanic Studies Series, 9 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 1–18
Haq, Sansan Ziaul, ‘Fenomena Wahyu Al-Quran’, Jurnal Al-Fanar, 2.2 (2020), 113–32 <https://doi.org/10.33511/alfanar.v2n2.113-132>
Igisani, Rithon, ‘Kajian Tafsir Mufassir Di Indonesia’, Potret Pemikiran, 22.1 (2018) <https://doi.org/10.30984/pp.v22i1.757>
Iwanebel, Fejrian Yazdajird, ‘Kontribusi Pemikiran Jane Dammen McAuliffe Terhadap Kerukunan Antar Umat Beragama’, Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 15.2 (2014) <https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2014.1502-07>
Izzan, Ahmad, ‘Menyingkap Ideologi Tafsir Studi Tafsir-Tafsir Di Tengah Keragaman Agama’, Tafkir : Jurnal Studi Islam, 2.2 <http://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/id/eprint/17723>
John Wansbrough, and Andrew Rippin, Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods Of Scriptural Interpretation (New York: Promotheusbook, 2004)
Lukman, Fadhli, ‘Ayat-Ayat Perdamaian: Dekonstruksi Tafsir Ala Jane Dammen McAuliffe’, ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 14.2 (2013), 217–38 <https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v14i2.758>
———, ‘Jane Dammen Mcauliffe’s Thought on The Qur’anic Presentation to the Bible’ (unpublished Skripsi, UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2012)
McAuliffe, Jane Dammen, ed., Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān (Leiden: Brill, 2001)
———, ‘Introduction’, in Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān, ed. by Jane Dammen McAuliffe (Leiden: Brill, 2001)
———, Islam, ed. by Jack Miles, First edition (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2017)
———, Qurʼānic Christians: An Analysis of Classical and Modern Exegesis (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991)
———, The Cambridge Companion to the Qur’ān (Cambridge University Press, 2006)
McAuliffe, Jane Dammen, Barry D. Walfish, and Joseph W Goering, eds., With Reference for the Word: Medieval Scriptural Exegesis in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)
Munawan, M., ‘A Critical Discourse Analysis Dalam Kajian Tafsir Alquran: Studi Tafsir Al-Azhar Karya Hamka’, Tajdid, 25.2 (2018), 155 <https://doi.org/10.36667/tajdid.v25i2.303>
Noor, Noer Huda, ‘Orientalis dan Tokoh Islam yang Terkontaminasi dengan Pemikiran Orientalis dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an’, al-Daulah, 2.1 (2013)
Rahman, Yusuf, ‘Pendekatan Tradisionalis Dan Revisionis Dalam Kajian Sejarah Pembentukan Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir Pada Masa Islam Awal’, Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies, 4.1 (2015), 129–45 <https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v4i1.2286>
Subakir, Ahmad, ‘Kritik Atas Orientalisme Dan Kecurigaan Atas Kajian Keislaman Di Dunia Barat’, Religió: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 4.2 (2014)
Sukidi Mulyadi, ‘The Gradual Qur’ān: Views of Early Muslim Commentators’ (unpublished Disertasi, Harvard University, 2019)
Syamsuddin, Syamsuddin, ‘Perkembangan Tafsir Al-Qur’an Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Ilmiah Islamic Resources, 16.1 (2019) <https://doi.org/10.33096/jiir.v16i1.2>
Ṭabarī, Ibn Jarīr, The History of Al-Ṭabarī Vol. 28 ʻAbbāsid Authority Affirmed: The Early Years of al-Manṣūr A.D. 753-763/A.H. 136-145, trans. by Jane Dammen McAuliffe, SUNY Series in Near Eastern Studies, v. 28 (Albany, N.Y: State University of New York Press, 1995)
Wathani, Syamsul, ‘John Wansbrough: Studi Atas Tradisi Dan Instrumen Tafsir Al-Qur’an Klasik’, Al-A’raf : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Dan Filsafat, 15.2 (2018), 295–314 <https://doi.org/10.22515/ajpif.v15i2.1247>
Zainol, Nur Zainatul Nadra, Muhd. Najib Abd. Kadir, and Latifah Abd. Majid, ‘Konsep Tafsir Al-Quran Menurut Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd’, Islamiyyat, 36.2 (2014), 39–46 <https://doi.org/10.17576/islamiyyat-2014-3602-04>
Zuchdi, Darmiyati, and Wiwiek Afifah, Analisis Konten, Etnografi & Grounded Theory, Dan Hermeneutika Dalam Penelitian (Jakarta Timur: Bumi Aksara, 2021)
Zulfikar, Eko, ‘Historisitas Perkembangan Tafsir Pada Masa Kemunduran Islam: Abad Kesembilan Dan Kesepuluh Hijriyah’, Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 30.2 (2019), 271–82 <https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v30i2.799>
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
